There’s a strange form of moral theater that plays out in every town.
A newspaper runs a glowing profile about “a local hero” — someone who delivers food to the needy, volunteers at a shelter, or coordinates community drives. They’re described in angelic tones, halo practically Photoshopped in.
But here’s the quiet absurdity: they’re often paid employees of nonprofits, community coordinators, or people whose “volunteerism” is backed by stipends, donations, and tax-funded grants. Meanwhile, the guy cleaning the parking lot at Walmart or the woman hauling garbage in the midday sun — they vanish into anonymity, their labor deemed ordinary and unworthy of spiritual spotlight.
We live in a culture that confuses visibility with virtue.
When goodness is seen, it’s celebrated; when it’s lived quietly, it’s ignored. The moral hierarchy becomes less about who contributes and more about who appears to contribute in a photogenic way. It’s the same social mirage that makes “influencers” seem enlightened for saying “be kind,” while the night-shift nurse gets no headline at all.
The truth is, the parking lot cleaner and the vaunted volunteer are both performing acts of service — one just happens to have a better PR department. Yet we insist on giving the illusion of sainthood to those who operate under the soft light of media praise, as though a televised virtue carries more moral weight than the unseen grind of honest work.
Epicurus might say tranquility isn’t found in applause, but in a quiet life lived without pretense. The man who minds his business, earns his keep, and treats others decently is no less virtuous than the “pillar of the community” with a photographer in tow. The difference is that one seeks peace; the other, perhaps unconsciously, seeks immortality in the public eye.
And so the pedestal spins. We keep mistaking performance for goodness, spectacle for substance.
Meanwhile, the parking lot gets cleaned.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.